Martin Rubey
2008-01-20 12:34:07 UTC
Dear all,
frequently I'm asked how programming in SPAD looks like. I then usually show
some function I'm just using, but that's quite unsatisfactory, because people
won't really understand.
So, the winning operation has to satisfy the following criteria:
* must be in the current algebra (i.e., SPAD, not interpreter code!)
* it's purpose should be relatively easy to grasp (say, math undergraduates)
* the mathematics behind it should be easy (say, math undergraduates)
* it should not be more than about 10 lines long
* it should be *beautiful*.
I'm curiously awaiting proposals.
Martin
PS: tomorrow and Tuesday I'm presenting axiom to students again (as free
alternative to MMA). I'm competing with maxima and sage, each of us has a
half-hour slot.
frequently I'm asked how programming in SPAD looks like. I then usually show
some function I'm just using, but that's quite unsatisfactory, because people
won't really understand.
So, the winning operation has to satisfy the following criteria:
* must be in the current algebra (i.e., SPAD, not interpreter code!)
* it's purpose should be relatively easy to grasp (say, math undergraduates)
* the mathematics behind it should be easy (say, math undergraduates)
* it should not be more than about 10 lines long
* it should be *beautiful*.
I'm curiously awaiting proposals.
Martin
PS: tomorrow and Tuesday I'm presenting axiom to students again (as free
alternative to MMA). I'm competing with maxima and sage, each of us has a
half-hour slot.